50 Reasons Not to Change/The Tribes
We Lead
A635.3.3.RB
After viewing the above presentations, reflect on the
following questions in a well-written post on your Reflection Blog.
- How
do you react when you hear colleagues using some of the excuses listed in
the 50 Reasons Not to Change graphic?
- Do
you ever use any of these excuses yourself?
- How
can you overcome the thinking that creates those responses to change efforts?
- Do
you agree with Seth Godin’s concept that change is driven by tribes?
- What
can you take away from this exercise to immediately use in your career?
At some level, everyone
has a natural resistant to change. Fears of the unknow has the ability to test
even the most steadfast individuals. Typically, we find (or create) excuses to
resist such change, especially when we have little reason to alter the status
quo. In fact, Dr. Daryl Watkins (n.d) provides such examples in his 50 Reasons
not to Change presentation; excuses like:
·
The boss will
never buy it.
·
It needs further
investigations.
·
Our competitors
are not doing it.
·
It’s too much
trouble to change.
·
Our company is different.
In an environment where
the status quo provides stability or even predictability, affecting change and
challenging the status que provides a major challenge for leaders and managers.
According to Mark Murphy (2014):
Ironically, getting
employees to accept change is easier when the situation is dire (like in a turnaround
situation where change feels urgent and necessary). But when employees get
comfortable because everything in the organization is good, they get complacent
with the status quo. That’s when you hear protests to change that sound like
this: “But we’re already doing great, there’s no need to change.”
There have been many occasions
during my time as a leader in military service when others have voiced their
resistance to change and may have even used some of Dr. Watkins’ excused verbatim.
Already knowing that resistance was inevitable, I would attempt to identify and
understand the root cause of the resistance. For example, is someone (or
others) resistance for the sake of being resistant? Are those resistant seeing
something that I do not see? What level are the problem-solving skills of the
resistant? Who stands to benefit if no change is made (path of least resistance)
and for how long (short term/long term)? Thus, anticipating resistance and underlying
causes, I would be able to better prepare my angle and argument for leading such
changes.
I believe it is important
for leaders to continuously seek opportunities to improve an organization
through active leadership and to leverage driving forces to effectively convey new
concepts and ideas. According to Brown (2011), “driving forces, put pressure on
the organization to change” (p. 129). Thus, leaders must be in-tune with many
factors that exist in a dynamic environment and be agile enough to exploit emergent
behaviors. With this in mind, this is why it is important for me to prevent the
nature urge to allow negative thoughts or excuses to occupy my thought process.
As many leaders in the military learn, it’s important to expect the best, but
plan for the worst. Through the planning processes, leaders must account for
the most likely course of enemy action and the most dangerous course of enemy
action.
Seth Godin (2009)
provides a compelling argument that tribes have the ability and power to affect
change through connecting others with ideas. In fact, Godin (2009) states, “And
it turns out that its tribes, not money, not factories that can change our world.
Than can change politics, that can align large number of people, not because
you force them to do something against their will, but because they wanted to
connect.” Thus, but making such (tribal) connections, a movement is created by
identifying true believers and leading the movement. I believe that Godin’s
argument that tribes drive change is accurate. History has shown that when
large organized groups (tribes) directly challenge the status quo, significant
change has resulted. Take for example notable event like the Boston Tea party,
which eventually lead to the Revolutionary War or the Civil War. Although these
are clearly extreme examples, smaller and still notable movement have altered
significant changes in our world and in our societies.
I believe it is important
for leaders/managers understand how resistance to change affects our
organization’s ability to be agile and flexible in a dynamic environment. Thus,
reflecting on this exercise, I also believe that trying to identify and
understand the root causes of resistance is key. Doing so will better prepare a
leader to convey their thoughts, ideas, and concepts. Furthermore, keeping Seth
Godin’s (2009) lessons in mind about leading movements by connecting others
(tribes), we as leaders have the ability to increase our effectiveness by leveraging
these tribes.
References
Brown, D.(2011) Experiential
Approach to Organization Development. Pearson Education. Kindle Edition.
Godin, S. (2009). The
tribes we lead. Ted. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/seth_godin_on_the_tribes_we_lead#t-739764.
Murphy, M. (2014). The
Status Quo Will Kill Change Management Efforts. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/markmurphy/2014/12/18/the-status-quo-will-kill-change-management-efforts/#72b5772d520d.
Watkins, D. (n.d.). 50
Reasons Not to Change! Prezi Presentation. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/00/node/55009.
No comments:
Post a Comment